How Significant Was Kevin Rudd's Apology to the Stolen Generations Essay

How Significant Was Kevin Rudds alibi to the Stolen Generations - Essay ExampleIt was a very immobile political expression that the country expressed towards the acknowledgment of fundamental valet de chambre rights. The apology statement had very relevant political and social implications on Australia and the observation tower of the country towards its indigenous populations. These implications stretch beyond the geographical boundaries of the country as the issue was discussed by the obliging society all across the world. The intent of this essay is to analyze the significance of Kevin Rudds vindication to the Stolen Generations. Background of the apology The apology was a political statement which had been awaited for many years. Indigenous children and children of Torres passing game Islanders were forcefully separated from their families by the Australian government. The justification that the Australian government had for this act was the desired objective of upward s ocial mobility and exposure of these children to the predominant modernized culture of Australia (Haebich, 2011). These children were later referred to as the Stolen Generation. An inquiry commission The Human Rights and Equal prospect Commission, headed by Mick Dodson and Sir Ronald Wilson, was setup to undertake the National dubiousness into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families (Haebich, 2011 p. 1033). ... 1033). The expression Lost Generation is justified by the huge percentage of children who were deprived of their parents and living systems. The report shed light to disturbing facts that these children were unhappy in the advance homes, institutions and adoptive families they were put in (Haebich, 2011, p. 1033). The report also contained evidence of forced labor imposed upon these children. The capacious interviews, conducted by the enquiry commission, observed consequences of separation which included medical and psycholog ical issues, addiction, violence, self harm and heretofore suicides (Haebich, 2011). In light of all these observations there was pressure on the Australian government both from inwardly the country and human rights movements across the world. Moreover, out of the 54 recommendations made by The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, one was that the Australian government must apologize to the stolen generation (Haebich, 2011). Since then, this has been a matter of political turn for all the governments which came to power in Australia. In other words, the apology was much awaited by the world. The policy-making Importance of the Apology The decision of Kevin Rudd to apologize to the Stolen Generation has its importance as a strong political expression. It must be noted here that after the report thoroughly asserting the posit of the apology was published, it was denied for 11 long years. No governments owned up the moral responsibility towards the Stolen Generation and the human rights violations faced by them. The general Australian response to the report was that the observations were inflammatory (Haebich, 2011, p. 1033). There was also